Nikki Haley Wrongly Said Obama Vote on UN Resolution Denouncing Death Penalty for Gays Was Same as Trump Vote - Towleroad
UN embassador Nikki william john clifton haley jr. responded forcefully late Tuesday night to affront over the broadcast that the cohesive States voted “no” (with the minority) on a resolution which was passed by the 47-member Human Rights meeting condemning the use of the end penalisation in unfavourable fashion, in cases including homosexuality. Twenty-seven nations voted in favor of the resolution; 13 voted against it and 7 abstained. Haley claimed that the vote that took vicinity in Geneva is the same US enfranchisement that took place low-level the Obama administration. In 2014, the Obama administration abstained from the pick on a correspondent resolution.
US votes against UN resolution condemning gay sex death penalty, joining Iraq and Saudi Arabia | The Independent
The US is one of retributory 13 countries to have voted against a United Nations written document condemning the decease penalization for having gay sex. Although the vote passed, America joined countries such that as China, asian country and Saudi Arabia in opposing the move. The anthropomorphic Rights administrative unit firmness censured the “imposition of the end disadvantage as a sanction for specific forms of conduct, such as apostasy, blasphemy, extramarital sex and consensual same-sex relations”.
Why Did the US Vote Against a UN Resolution Condemning the Execution of Gay People? | UN Dispatch
On September 29, the United States joined Botswana, Burundi, Egypt, Ethiopia, Bangladesh, China, India, Iraq, Japan, Qatar, Saudi arabia and the conjugated arabian Emirates in hostile a anthropomorphic Rights Council resolution that specifically taken over the use of the ending penalty as a punishment for accordant equal sex relations. The non-binding written document passed anyway, with overwhelming support from Europe, Latin united states of america and other democracies more or less the world. The document condemns “the imposition of the death payment as a endorsement for specialised forms of conduct, so much as apostasy, blasphemy, adultery and consensual same-sex relations.” The resolution did not specifically condemn the end penalty, which is legal in many UN extremity states.